Nobody reads the dashboard, reporting should tell you to do something, not just show you numbers
Dashboards get built, admired for a fortnight, then quietly abandoned. That is a design problem, not a discipline problem. A number with no decision attached is decoration.
A dashboard gets built. There is a meeting where it is shown, and it looks good, because dashboards always look good on the day they are demonstrated. For two weeks people open it. By the second month, nobody does.
This happens so reliably that it is worth treating as a design problem rather than a discipline problem. People are not failing to check the dashboard because they lack rigour. They are not checking it because it never asked them to do anything.
A number with no decision attached is decoration
Most reporting answers the question how are we doing. That is a comfortable question and it has no end. You can look at the answer every day for a year and never be required to act, which means the cost of not looking is zero, which means eventually you stop.
Useful reporting answers a narrower question. Do I need to do something today, and if so, what. That question has a threshold in it, and a threshold is the thing that turns a number into an instruction. Enquiries this week is a fact. Enquiries this week are down by a third on the same week last month is the beginning of a decision.
Push, do not pull
The second failure is delivery. A dashboard waits for you to visit it. Every visit is a small act of will, competing with everything else in the day, and the visits that matter most are the ones during the busy weeks when nobody has the time.
So the reports we build come to people. A short weekly summary in an inbox, on the same morning every week. An alert when something crosses a line that was agreed in advance, sent to the person who can act on it, with enough context that they do not have to go looking. The full detail still lives somewhere for the moments you want to dig, but nothing important depends on anyone remembering to go and look.
Three questions before anything gets built
Before a report is built, we want three answers. What decision does this inform. What number would change that decision, and in which direction. Who is the one person who acts when it does.
If any of those three cannot be answered, the report does not get built, and that is usually the most valuable outcome of the conversation. A surprising amount of requested reporting evaporates at question one, which saves everybody the ritual of building something that will be quietly abandoned by October.
What good looks like
Good reporting is boring. It is a small number of things, delivered without being asked for, each attached to an action and an owner. It tends to be less impressive in a demo than a wall of charts, and considerably more useful in the eleventh month.
If you already have a dashboard nobody opens, do not add to it. Ask what it was supposed to make somebody do, and build that instead.
A number with no decision attached is decoration.
You might also like.
Short pieces on the patterns we see across the work, and the principles behind how we price it.
Every business has one person who cannot go on holiday.
Ask what would break if one particular person were away for two weeks, and watch the pause. There is almost always a name, and that name is a risk nobody has priced.
Read the post →How we thinkThe cheapest leads you have are the ones you are already ignoring.
Most businesses have demand they are not collecting before they have demand they need to buy. Search, maps and referrals come first. Paid ads are the last lever, not the first.
Read the post →How we thinkThe ads are not the problem, the machine behind them is.
Turning on ads before the funnel behind them converts is the most common way businesses waste money. The funnel is the machine. Ads are just the moment you switch it on.
Read the post →Patterns we seeThe spreadsheet that became a system when no one was looking.
Almost every team has one workbook everyone is quietly afraid to touch. Here is how it got that way, and what to do about it.
Read the post →Industry observationsMost automation projects fail before anyone writes code.
When an automation project goes wrong, the tool usually gets the blame. The real cause is almost always something that happened earlier.
Read the post →Worked examplesWhat we built when sales spent nine hours a week on lead routing.
A 30-person SaaS sales team was losing nine hours a week to lead routing. Here is what the fix looked like in practice, and what we deliberately did not build.
Read the post →How we thinkThe list of automations is a roadmap, not a shopping basket.
Most automation pitches arrive as a menu of pick-three options. We deliver them as a sequenced plan, ordered by where the hours actually come back.
Read the post →Patterns we seeThree signs the boring bit of your day is fixable.
A short diagnostic for people who suspect the boring layer of their day is fixable but cannot quite name what it is.
Read the post →How we thinkWhy we count the hours before we touch a tool.
The most useful number in an automation project is not a price. It is the hours a task quietly eats every week.
Read the post →Finance and accountingCutting the monthly close from eight days to two.
A 28-person fintech was losing the first eight working days of every month to close. Three small connections later, the close runs in two days and around 120 hours a month come back across the team.
Read the case study →Customer service and supportTriaging 1,200 weekly tickets before an agent opens one.
A 60-person SaaS team was getting 1,200 tickets a week, most of them in five buckets. A triage layer classifies, routes, and attaches the right macro. Real bugs surface to a human inside an hour, not five.
Read the case study →Operations and logisticsStopping orders falling between Shopify and the warehouse.
A 45-person homeware brand was pushing orders to its 3PL via twice-daily CSV exports. A webhook-driven feed replaced the CSVs and the oversells stopped.
Read the case study →Professional servicesClient onboarding in 20 minutes, not two hours of forms.
An 18-person law firm was spending two hours of partner or paralegal time on every new matter. One form, one routing layer, and the partner signs a pre-populated letter while the rest is already done.
Read the case study →E-commerce and DTCSyncing 4,000 SKUs across Shopify and Amazon every hour, not every Tuesday.
A 12-person DTC pet brand ran its inventory sync as a weekly manual job. The hourly automatic sync took the manual loop away. Tuesday came back.
Read the case study →Not sure where to start? Take the 5-minute audit.
11 questions, your automation score, an estimated time-loss number, and three personalised recommendations. No email needed to see your results.
A focused workshop. A written report you keep.
A focused day mapping your operations and scoring the automation opportunities. The ranked plan you can act on, with us or without, follows. From £1,500.
Want to chat?
Two ways in. Send us a message about what's broken, or book a 30-minute call if you already know what you'd like built. Both reach the same person.
